You mean it would never pass? It wasn't obvious to me. Anyhow one could
always just declare someone speaker.
On Saturday, September 17, 2016, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:25 PM Aris Merchant <thoughtsoflifeandlight17@
>> The first bit seems fine. The second bit though... Okay, I don't really
>> know the precedent on this, but it seems like a fairly minor thing to have
>> someone win over. I mean if someone fixes a game-braking error, or even a
>> major one, that makes sense. But this doesn't even break anything. It just
>> means that the election mechanics don't function quite as intended.
> Well yes, but winning is how you become Speaker. In any case the second
> proposal is an obvious scam.