On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 1:53 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> While I love the idea and I applaud you for taking the time to do that, it > seems a tad impractical. > > ---- > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> > My Copy of RONR11 would also suggest that it is a point of >> order, given that it is a custom >> > of the Assembly. >> > >> > ----Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> > >> >> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Aris Merchant < >> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> >> We >>>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:16 AM Benjamin Schultz < >> ben.dov.schu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> need >>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Kerim Aydin < >> ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >> more >>>> >> sides >>>> >> in >>>> Minor point of order for new folks: >> this >>>> >> thread >>>> We've historically promoted bottom-posting for replies >> (with editing of past >> so >>>> thread pieces allowed). Unfortunately not >> well-supported by current email >> let's >>>> clients. I mildly prefer bottom-posting for things >> like judicial threads with >> think >>>> counter arguments. Ultimately, I don't mind either >> way, but the combination of >> out of >>>> different people using both bottom and top-posting >> makes these longer threads a >> the >>>> bit challenging to follow :) >> box. >>> >> >>> >> -G. >>> Nitpicking point of procedure: >> >>> >> >>> You raised a point of personal privilege, having to do with >> ease of or impediments to >> >>> participation, instead of a point of order, a breach of >> procedure. At least according >> >>> to RONR10, and Agora by custom follows S&N. >> >> >> >> Given that it affects everyone, wouldn't it be a point of the >> privileges of the assembly >> >> (a point of privilege affecting the assembly, depending on >> where you look)? That's what >> >> my copy of RONR11 seems to suggest, although I may well be >> misinterpreting it. >> >> >> >> -Aris >> >> > G. is anything but practical if my memory is accurate. If the Research Assistant existed right now I'd make a request for historical data on the topic.
