If this is the case then there was an error in the last report of the
office tracking shinies, because I was charged the pending fee. Anyways,I
submit the following proposal:
{{{
Title: Agora's To-Do List (v2/ov1)
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
Enact a rule titled, "To-Do List", reading: "Any player MAY without two
objection
add an item to the to-do list with a specified number of
Shinies associated with it. Any to-do list item must have a clear set
of requirements for completion. The to-do list shall be maintained by
the Lister. Any person MAY complete an item on the to-do list and
claim the specified number of Shinies associated with it by notifying
the Lister of their completion of the task. If the Lister agrees with
the claimee, the Lister shall without two objection pay the claimee the
specified number of
Shinies from Agora. Any disagreement regarding completion shall be
resolved via a CFJ. After an item has been completed, the Lister shall
remove it from the to-do list."
Enact a rule titled, "The Office of the Lister", reading: "The Lister
is an office; its holder is responsible for maintaining the to-do of
Agora.
The Lister's Weekly report includes the current state of the Agoran
to-do list and any recent events thereof."
}}}
----
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Sprocklem S <[email protected]> wrote:
> I judge CFJ 3479 FALSE.
>
> Judges arguments:
>
> I'm inclined to agree that “formatting errors” is not an objective
> criteria. Additionally, even if it weren't too ambiguous, it seems like
> it would set a bad precedent to allow such difficult to determine
> conditionals. It's a lot easier just to have people just resubmit the
> proposal if a (formatting) error is found.
>
>
> Since the context is lacking in the CFJ itself, I have included it below.
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus called the CFJ:
> > Agora's To-Do List is a proposal that was in the proposal pool and has
> > been pended.
>
> This was caused by objections raised by Aris about the validity of the
> conditional clause of the submission:
> > "Formatting errors" is highly ambiguous. Unless you can clarify it
> > down to something easily checkable, I'm going to count that statement
> > as void.
>
> The relevant text of PSS's submission is duplicated below:
> > I submit the following proposal if it has no formatting errors and its
> > passage would create two new rules:
> >
> > {{{
> > Title: Agora's To-Do List
> > Adoption index: 1.0
> > Author: Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> >
> > Enact a rule titled, "To-Do List", reading: "Any player MAY with 1
> > support add an item to the to-do list with a specified number of
> > Shinies associated with it. Any to-do list item must have a clear set
> > of requirements for completion. The to-do list shall be maintained by
> > the Lister. Any person MAY complete an item on the to-do list and
> > claim the specified number of Shinies associated with it by notifying
> > the Lister of their completion of the task. If the Lister agrees with
> > the claimee, the Lister shall pay the claimee the specified number of
> > Shinies from Agora. Any disagreement regarding completion shall be
> > resolved via a CFJ. After an item has been completed, the Lister shall
> > remove it from the to-do list."
> >
> > Enact a rule titled, "The Office of the Lister", reading: "The Lister
> > is an office; its holder is responsible for maintaining the to-do of
> > Agora.
> >
> > The Lister's Weekly report includes the current state of the Agoran
> > to-do list and any recent events thereof."
> > }}}
>
>
> --
> Sprocklem
>
