Why? There are other excuses for having long messages (scam attempts, for example), and we don’t want people trying to sneak things by in those either.
Gaelan > On May 22, 2017, at 6:35 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'd be pro this if it was only disallowed within official duties. > > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 18:34 Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com > <mailto:g...@canishe.com>> wrote: > I create the power-1 proposal “No Sneakiness” by Gaelan: { > Create a rule “No Sneakiness” with the following text: { > If the rules specify that an action may be performed by sending a message to > a public forum, any attempts to perform the action in a way that is clearly > intended to prevent others from detecting the action (such as by embedding it > in another, longer message) are INEFFECTIVE. > } > } > > Gaelan
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
