How does the current CFJ database work? Is it plain HTML, or generated somehow?
If you already have the files used for that, then you could just go with that.
That format looks fine, although it would be nice if you listed the rule number
to apply the implication to. (Is that the citations?) Alternatively, you could
generate a YAML file like this:
CFJ XXXX:
judged by: XXX
judged on: YYYY-MM-DD
IMPLICATIONS: |
(text)
CITATIONS: |
(text)
This is valid YAML, but if you weren't looking for it you'd never know.
> On May 25, 2017, at 10:21 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Thu, 25 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>> I'd love if you could place these annotations somewhere my FLR script can
>> access.
>> I'll try and send you a file with the old annotations I parsed out from the
>> FLR tonight.
>
> I will; for now I'll put a single index file or page (and may wait until I
> have
> a few more). Any suggestions/changes on metadata format? (emphasizing human
> readability
> but with enough consistency for scripting, so planning to have capitalized
> subheadings
> as shown below).
>
> CFJ XXXX
> judged by YYYY: date
> IMPLICATIONS
> (text)
> CITATIONS
> (text)
>
> I'll also probably auto-generate a table version like the current index, if
> that's
> easier to scrape.
>
>
>
