This is a bit of a mess I've caused to him really, lol. I'll help tidy it up a bit so that things are more clear:
Gratuitous argument for that CFJ: There has been a bit of tumbling, but with people's input, the most recent version of my scam goes like this: ▪ In R2491 we have: "At the start of each month, if Agora owns at least one Estate, the Surveyor shall put one Estate which is owned by Agora up for auction, by announcement. Each auction ends seven days after it begins.". During the "Start of the Month", even if the Surveyor puts just the first Estate up to Auction, "if Agora owns at least one Estate" is still true. There are still Estates in Agora's ownership even after the Surveyor put the first one up to auction. Ergo, it would be required to put up yet another Estate. And another, and another, until there are no more Estates, during the time it was his duty to do so. This is the obligation I deputized for, from *last month's* auctions - The June Auctions - because it has "expired more than fourteen days ago". ▪ I did the deputization and auctions here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg28798.html ▪ This is my conjecture, but I believe that he has lost the office and that I have it now (hence his doubts, I suspect, please let me know if I'm wrong and its something else), via R2160: "When a player deputises via normal deputisation for an elected office, e becomes the holder of that office.". I deputized for the office of Surveyor, so I've now become the Surveyor. On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Alex Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 01:57 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > I CFJ on the statement “I am the Surveyor.” > > This is likely to be dismissed due to lack of context. What's the > controversy that might affect whether or not you're the Surveyor? > > -- > ais523 >
