I'm sure that there have been other Arbitors before and I'm very happy to
have G as it now, but it just feels weird to me to have not-ais do it lol.
I dunno why. Habit? Oh well.
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>
> This was previously assigned to o, but copy/paste messup gave it the wrong
> subject line. This is to make sure there's a clear subject line with the
> assignment.
>
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> > The below CFJ is #3559. I assign it to o.
> >
> > Aris, if you could provide a message link to the proposal in question, it
> > would be appreciated.
> >
> > On Thu, 14 Sep 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
> >
> > > I AP-CFJ on the following:
> > >
> > > The statement "Lines beginning with hashmarks ('#') and comments in
> > > square brackets ('[]') have no effect on the behavior of this
> > > proposal. They are not part of any rules
> > > created or amended herein, and may be considered for all game purposes
> to
> > > have been removed before its resolution.", as it appears near the
> > > beginning of the contracts proposal I sent to agora-discussion, has
> > > the clearly intended effect.
> > >
> > > Arguments:
> > >
> > > The last paragraph of Rule 106 implies that this works. Also,
> > > proposals are interpreted as human readable text, so it makes sense
> > > that portions could be commented out.
> > >
> > > -Aris
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
