I think that is a wise plan. I feel like I didn't do very much aside from
watch for the first six months I was playing (my organization
notwithstanding).

天火狐

On 22 September 2017 at 13:25, ATMunn . <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the welcome package, whether it actually worked or not.
>
> I still have no real idea what I'm going to do; so for now I'll just watch
> and see what comes up. I'm sure I'll find something to do sooner or later.
>
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote:
>
>> On Sep 21, 2017, at 9:35 AM, ATMunn . <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hey! I'm ATMunn.
>> > I discovered Agora a little while back, and just decided it sounded
>> interesting, so I joined.
>> >
>> > I've seen some of the messages that have been so far, and honestly I
>> have no idea what's going on, or what to do. :P
>> > But it seems like there's a really friendly community here, so I'm sure
>> you all can help me learn the ropes.
>> >
>> > I've also joined the IRC channel. I'm usually quite active on IRC, so
>> you can pretty much always contact me there (I may not respond right away
>> though if I'm busy).
>>
>> Welcome!
>>
>> 10 Fun Things To Do In Agora When You’re Dead:
>>
>> * Scam a dictatorship and single-handedly cause a month-long lull in the
>> game.
>>
>> * Sit on an eighth of the economic resources and do nothing obvious with
>> them. (Cough.)
>>
>> * Write a proposal that is impossible to vote against.
>>
>> * Vote against it anyways.
>>
>> * Demonstrate that an innocent-looking mechanic is far more powerful and
>> useful than anyone intended.
>>
>> * Design a subgame. Try to get it enacted into the rules.
>>
>> * Run for an office.
>>
>> * Run from an office.
>>
>> * Find the most unlikely interpretations of the rules and call endless
>> CFJs to support those interpretations.
>>
>> * Win.
>>
>> I’ve kicked over a welcome package (Rule 2499) for you. This should give
>> you enough shinies to put forward several proposals and calls for
>> judgement, if it catches your fancy to do so.
>>
>> Note that by a strict reading of the rules, that action did not work -
>> this is a known issue and proposals are in flight to fix that problem. We
>> have an established agreement to keep records as if that the actions work
>> anyways, and I plan to ratify the results retroactively once the rules are
>> fixed. Reading up on the history of this problem might be interesting if
>> you have interest in how the rules function.
>>
>> -o
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to