Why not keep the birthday tournament. It existed before regulations. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus [email protected]
> On Oct 14, 2017, at 8:08 PM, Alexis Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > > Decided to put my money where my mouth is. > > Proposal: Deregulation (AI=3) > {{{ > Repeal Rule 2493 (Regulations). > Repeal Rule 2494 (The Regkeepor). > Amend Rule 2464 (Tournaments) to read as follows: > A Tournament is a sub-game of Agora specifically sanctioned > to be initiated as a tournament by the Rules. If a winner of a > tournament is determined within 4 weeks of its initiation, that > person or persons win the game, otherwise the tournament > concludes with no winner. > > In a timely fashion after the start of June 1 of each year, > the Herald SHALL propose a set of Regulations governing a > Birthday Tournament for that year; the Herald CAN also > delegate the responsibility for creating or running the > tournament to another player, with that player's consent. > > The Birthday Tournament's regulations SHOULD be such that all > persons who choose to participate have a fair chance of winning > the tournament (according to its regulations), and a winner > SHOULD be expected within 2-3 weeks following the tournament's > initiation. > > After adequate time for discussion of the Birthday Tournament's > regulations, the Herald (or delegate) CAN initiate a sanctioned > tournament with a specified, finalized set of regulations, > Without 3 Objections. The initiation SHOULD be timed to > coincide with Agora's Birthday. > Repeal Rule 2495 (The Birthday Tournament). > }}} > > This effectively just repeals regulations, which I think are very dangerous > and should not be used in place of things like contracts. Tournaments are > reverted to the pre-Regulations rules. I spend an AP to pend this proposal. > > -Alexis
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
