You're definitely alive, CB. On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Cuddle Beam <[email protected]> wrote: > Random message to keep self alive. > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:05 PM, ATMunn . <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Ah, I see. Okay. >> >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Alexis Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Nope, read the rest of the rule. This rule only provides a definition of >>> what those terms mean; it does not apply anywhere where the terms aren't >>> used. >>> >>> We used to have a rule implying that you could weaken the conditions >>> (e.g. perform independent actions dependently, or perform an action with >>> more support or without more fewer objections than required) but it was >>> removed. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017, 09:11 ATMunn ., <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Rule 1728 states the following: >>>>> >>>>> A rule which purports to allow a person (the performer) to >>>>> perform an action by a set of one or more of the following >>>>> methods (N is 1 unless otherwise specified): >>>>> >>>>> 1. Without N Objections, where N is a positive integer no >>>>> greater than 8. ("Without Objection" is shorthand for this >>>>> method with N = 1.) >>>>> 2. With N Supporters, where N is a positive integer. ("With >>>>> Support" is shorthand for this method with N = 1.) >>>>> 3. With N Agoran Consent, where N is an integer multiple of 0.1 >>>>> with a minimum of 1. >>>>> 4. With Notice. >>>>> 5. With T Notice, where T is a time period. >>>>> >>>>> [snip] >>>> >>>> Now, the sentence at the top basically says that a rule can allow a >>>> person to perform an action by one of the methods in the list. However, I >>>> was wondering whether or not a person can perform an action by one of those >>>> methods WITHOUT a rule requiring em to, specifically With Notice/With T >>>> Notice. >> >> >
-- >From V.J. Rada
