Random message to keep self alive.
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:05 PM, ATMunn . <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah, I see. Okay.
>
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Nope, read the rest of the rule. This rule only provides a definition of
>> what those terms mean; it does not apply anywhere where the terms aren't
>> used.
>>
>> We used to have a rule implying that you could weaken the conditions
>> (e.g. perform independent actions dependently, or perform an action with
>> more support or without more fewer objections than required) but it was
>> removed.
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017, 09:11 ATMunn ., <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Rule 1728 states the following:
>>>
>>>> A rule which purports to allow a person (the performer) to
>>>> perform an action by a set of one or more of the following
>>>> methods (N is 1 unless otherwise specified):
>>>>
>>>> 1. Without N Objections, where N is a positive integer no
>>>> greater than 8. ("Without Objection" is shorthand for this
>>>> method with N = 1.)
>>>> 2. With N Supporters, where N is a positive integer. ("With
>>>> Support" is shorthand for this method with N = 1.)
>>>> 3. With N Agoran Consent, where N is an integer multiple of 0.1
>>>> with a minimum of 1.
>>>> 4. With Notice.
>>>> 5. With T Notice, where T is a time period.
>>>>
>>>> [snip]
>>>>
>>>> Now, the sentence at the top basically says that a rule can allow a
>>> person to perform an action by one of the methods in the list. However, I
>>> was wondering whether or not a person can perform an action by one of those
>>> methods WITHOUT a rule requiring em to, specifically With Notice/With T
>>> Notice.
>>>
>>
>
