We really need to bring back rule annotations for important CFJs. On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 2:53 PM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's established precedent actually that subject-lines don't count for > anything unless specifically mentioned in the message (eg, I do the > action in the subject line). I couldn't tell you exactly where or > which CFJs although I'm sure G or Orjan could. Problem with > cntrl-F-ing the CFJ database is that CFJ statements often have little > to do with the issue contained in them (recent example: it's hard to > tell that the only useful precedent on agencies is under the statement > "C<3M is an agency" while other CFJs with similar statements are > worthless). > > On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Telnaior <j...@iinet.net.au> wrote: >> This is a notice of honour. (Apparently the subject line doesn't count) >> Alexis gains a Karma for being extra helpful, Gaelan loses a Karma for being >> slack on reporting. > > > > -- > From V.J. Rada
-- >From V.J. Rada
