You do, but you should deny all of them.

On 11/05/2017 09:50 PM, ATMunn wrote:
> Wait so... what's actually going on here? Do I need to respond to the
> CoEs or what? I'm very confused right now.
> Also, ATTN Aris: NttPF.
>
> On 11/5/2017 8:54 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
>> I CoE your CoE. Rule 879 states that
>>
>> "Each Agoran Decision has a quorum. This is a number set when the
>> decision is created, and thereafter cannot be changed. When a person
>> initiates an Agoran Decision, that person SHALL state the quorum of
>> that decision. However, incorrectly stating the quorum of a decision
>> does not invalidate the initiation, nor does it actually change the
>> quorum of the decision."
>>
>> Nowhere does it say that failing to announce quorum invalidates the
>> decision.
>>
>> -Aris
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> CoE: The quorum is not specified for the first decision.
>>>
>>> On 11/01/2017 09:15 AM, ATMunn wrote:
>>>> On 10/31/2017 9:34 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
>>>>> Sorry Munn, neither the initiation of the election nor the
>>>>> distribution of the proposal worked. Rules say the following "the
>>>>> ADoP
>>>>> CAN and SHALL, _in the same message_: 1) If the election is
>>>>> contested,
>>>>> initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the election (the
>>>>> poll). For this decision, the Vote Collector is the Assessor, the
>>>>> valid options are the candidates for that election (including those
>>>>> who become candidates after its initiation), and the voting method is
>>>>> instant runoff. 2) Distribute all pendingCampaign Proposals
>>>>> associated
>>>>> with the election.".
>>>>>
>>>>> Gotta be in the same message.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 11:35 AM, ATMunn <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Ah, thanks for letting me know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/31/2017 8:32 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (by the way ATMunn, I am uncommitted).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I vote for myself, and FOR my campaign proposal.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I vote in favour.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/31/2017 08:29 PM, ATMunn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I was too lazy to check for very long, sorry.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I hereby distribute the below campaign proposal, initiating the
>>>>>>>>> Agoran
>>>>>>>>> Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the vote
>>>>>>>>> collector
>>>>>>>>> is the Assessor, the quorum is [quorum] and the valid options are
>>>>>>>>> FOR
>>>>>>>>> and AGAINST (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as are
>>>>>>>>> conditionals).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Title: Referee Reform and Card Appealability
>>>>>>>>> Author: V.J. Rada
>>>>>>>>> Co-author(s):
>>>>>>>>> Adoption Index: 2
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Change the power of rule 2451, Executive Orders, to 2.0. In this
>>>>>>>>> rule,
>>>>>>>>> replace the text "The reason for the card MAY be any grievance
>>>>>>>>> held by
>>>>>>>>> the Prime Minister" with "Notwithstanding rule 2426, the
>>>>>>>>> reason for
>>>>>>>>> the card MAY be any grievance held by the Prime Minister"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In rule 2426, replace the text
>>>>>>>>> "Cards CANNOT be issued except by players by announcement. Any
>>>>>>>>> attempt
>>>>>>>>> to issue a Card, or any intent for a dependent action to issue a
>>>>>>>>> Card,
>>>>>>>>> is INEFFECTIVE if it does not include the following information:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The type of Card being issued,
>>>>>>>>> The person to whom the Card is being issued (the bad sport), and
>>>>>>>>> The specific action, inaction of the bad sport giving rise to the
>>>>>>>>> Card
>>>>>>>>> (the reason)."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> with the text
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Cards CANNOT be issued except by players by announcement. Any
>>>>>>>>> attempt
>>>>>>>>> to issue a Card is INEFFECTIVE if it does not include (1) the
>>>>>>>>> type of
>>>>>>>>> card being issued, (2) the name of the person being issued the
>>>>>>>>> card
>>>>>>>>> (the bad sport), and (3) the specific reason for the issuance
>>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>>> card, or if it attempts to issue a person a card for an action or
>>>>>>>>> inaction which e (more likely than not) did not commit, or if it
>>>>>>>>> attempts to issue a card for an action or inaction which is not
>>>>>>>>> prohibited by law, or if it attempts to issue a type of card
>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>> blatantly and obviously unsuited to the conduct which constitutes
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> reason for its issuance or to the person to which it is being
>>>>>>>>> issued,
>>>>>>>>> or if it is made more than 14 days after the conduct constituting
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> reason for the issuance of the card, or if it attempts to issue a
>>>>>>>>> card
>>>>>>>>> to a player who has already been issued a card for the conduct
>>>>>>>>> constituting the reason for the issuance of the card."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also in rule 2426, remove the last paragraph.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In rule 2479 "Official Justice", remove the last paragraph.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also in rule 2479, replace the text "The Referee CANNOT Point eir
>>>>>>>>> Finger or impose Summary Judgment more than five total times per
>>>>>>>>> week,
>>>>>>>>> or more than twice per week at or on the same person."
>>>>>>>>> with the text
>>>>>>>>> "The Referee CANNOT impose Summary Judgement more than three
>>>>>>>>> times a
>>>>>>>>> week".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also in rule 2479, append, at the end of the first paragraph, the
>>>>>>>>> text
>>>>>>>>> "Summary Judgement is imposed on the Referee's own initiative,
>>>>>>>>> and not
>>>>>>>>> in response to any official proceeding".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In rule 2478, "Vigilante Justice", remove the last paragraph.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also in rule 2478, replace the text " - issuing a Card to the
>>>>>>>>> pointed-at person by announcement whose reason is rooted in the
>>>>>>>>> allegation; or"
>>>>>>>>> with the text
>>>>>>>>> " - Imposing the Cold Hand of Justice, issuing a Card to the
>>>>>>>>> pointed-at person by announcement whose reason is rooted in the
>>>>>>>>> allegation; or"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also in rule 2478, add below the dot-points and above the
>>>>>>>>> paragraph
>>>>>>>>> beginning "The Referee is by default", add a new paragraph which
>>>>>>>>> reads
>>>>>>>>> "There is no limit on how many times a player may impose the Cold
>>>>>>>>> Hand
>>>>>>>>> of Justice per week".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Add a new rule at power 1 entitled "Referee Accountability"
>>>>>>>>> with the
>>>>>>>>> text "If the Referee attempts to issue three or more INEFFECTIVE
>>>>>>>>> cards
>>>>>>>>> in a week, any player CAN, with two support, issue a writ of
>>>>>>>>> Impartial
>>>>>>>>> Arbitration Restoration, immediately making the position of
>>>>>>>>> Referee
>>>>>>>>> vacant. When a writ of Impartial Arbitration Restoration is
>>>>>>>>> issued,
>>>>>>>>> the ADoP SHALL initiate an election for the Referee within a
>>>>>>>>> timely
>>>>>>>>> fashion"
>>>>>>>>> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I vote PRESENT (for now, I might change my vote later once I have
>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>> to actually think about what this is saying)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 10/31/2017 4:09 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ttttpf
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:08 AM, VJ Rada <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg30296.html
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:07 AM, VJ Rada <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> COE: There was absolutely a flippin' campaign proposal from
>>>>>>>>>>>> me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 1:01 AM, ATMunn
>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> As per my duties as ADoP, I hereby initiate the Agoran
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Decision to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> select the winner of the Referee election.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> valid
>>>>>>>>>>>>> options are the candidates (PRESENT is always a valid vote,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> as are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> conditionals), and the voting method is instant runoff.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Currently, the candidates are VJ Rada and o. As the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> election is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> contested, any player still may become a candidate until the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> poll
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ends.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were no campaign proposals.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, I strongly encourage anyone voting on election-related
>>>>>>>>>>>>> things to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> post your votes in this thread from now on.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here are all of the current votes (attn: PSS)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rulekeepor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> o: {PSS, Alexis, Trigon}
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ATMunn: {Alexis, PSS}
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexis: Conditional ({Alexis, Trigon} if Alexis publishes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a FLR
>>>>>>>>>>>>> draft
>>>>>>>>>>>>>             to a forum before the end of the voting period;
>>>>>>>>>>>>> {Trigon,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexis}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>             otherwise.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> VJ Rada: {Trigon}
>>>>>>>>>>>>> PSS: {PSS, Alexis}
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aris: {Trigon, Alexis}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Agronomist
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ATMunn: {o}
>>>>>>>>>>>>> VJ Rada: PRESENT
>>>>>>>>>>>>> PSS: PRESENT
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexis: {o, VJ Rada}
>>>>>>>>>>>>> o: {o, VJ Rada}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Proposals 7954-7956
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>            |7954|7955|7956
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------+----+----+----+------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ATMunn |F   |A   |F   |
>>>>>>>>>>>>> VJ Rada|F   |A   |F   |
>>>>>>>>>>>>> PSS    |F   |A   |F   |
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexis |F   |F   |F   |
>>>>>>>>>>>>> o      |F   |A   |F   |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------+----+----+----+------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>     From V.J. Rada
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>     From V.J. Rada
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> ----
>>>>>>>> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Oh. Well then...
>>>>
>>>> As per my duties as ADoP, I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to
>>>> select the winner of the Referee election.
>>>>
>>>> For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the valid
>>>> options are the candidates (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as are
>>>> conditionals), and the voting method is instant runoff.
>>>>
>>>> Currently, the candidates are VJ Rada and o. As the election is
>>>> contested, any player still may become a candidate until the poll
>>>> ends.
>>>>
>>>> I also hereby distribute the below campaign proposal, initiating the
>>>> AgoranDecision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the vote
>>>> collector is the Assessor, the quorum is 6.0 and the valid options are
>>>> FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as are conditionals).
>>>>
>>>> Please vote again!
>>>>
>>>> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>>>
>>>> Title: Referee Reform and Card Appealability
>>>> Author: V.J. Rada
>>>> Co-author(s):
>>>> Adoption Index: 2
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Change the power of rule 2451, Executive Orders, to 2.0. In this rule,
>>>> replace the text "The reason for the card MAY be any grievance held by
>>>> the Prime Minister" with "Notwithstanding rule 2426, the reason for
>>>> the card MAY be any grievance held by the Prime Minister"
>>>>
>>>> In rule 2426, replace the text
>>>> "Cards CANNOT be issued except by players by announcement. Any attempt
>>>> to issue a Card, or any intent for a dependent action to issue a Card,
>>>> is INEFFECTIVE if it does not include the following information:
>>>>
>>>> The type of Card being issued,
>>>> The person to whom the Card is being issued (the bad sport), and
>>>> The specific action, inaction of the bad sport giving rise to the Card
>>>> (the reason)."
>>>>
>>>> with the text
>>>>
>>>> "Cards CANNOT be issued except by players by announcement. Any attempt
>>>> to issue a Card is INEFFECTIVE if it does not include (1) the type of
>>>> card being issued, (2) the name of the person being issued the card
>>>> (the bad sport), and (3) the specific reason for the issuance of the
>>>> card, or if it attempts to issue a person a card for an action or
>>>> inaction which e (more likely than not) did not commit, or if it
>>>> attempts to issue a card for an action or inaction which is not
>>>> prohibited by law, or if it attempts to issue a type of card which is
>>>> blatantly and obviously unsuited to the conduct which constitutes the
>>>> reason for its issuance or to the person to which it is being issued,
>>>> or if it is made more than 14 days after the conduct constituting the
>>>> reason for the issuance of the card, or if it attempts to issue a card
>>>> to a player who has already been issued a card for the conduct
>>>> constituting the reason for the issuance of the card."
>>>>
>>>> Also in rule 2426, remove the last paragraph.
>>>>
>>>> In rule 2479 "Official Justice", remove the last paragraph.
>>>>
>>>> Also in rule 2479, replace the text "The Referee CANNOT Point eir
>>>> Finger or impose Summary Judgment more than five total times per week,
>>>> or more than twice per week at or on the same person."
>>>> with the text
>>>> "The Referee CANNOT impose Summary Judgement more than three times a
>>>> week".
>>>>
>>>> Also in rule 2479, append, at the end of the first paragraph, the text
>>>> "Summary Judgement is imposed on the Referee's own initiative, and not
>>>> in response to any official proceeding".
>>>>
>>>> In rule 2478, "Vigilante Justice", remove the last paragraph.
>>>>
>>>> Also in rule 2478, replace the text " - issuing a Card to the
>>>> pointed-at person by announcement whose reason is rooted in the
>>>> allegation; or"
>>>> with the text
>>>> " - Imposing the Cold Hand of Justice, issuing a Card to the
>>>> pointed-at person by announcement whose reason is rooted in the
>>>> allegation; or"
>>>>
>>>> Also in rule 2478, add below the dot-points and above the paragraph
>>>> beginning "The Referee is by default", add a new paragraph which reads
>>>> "There is no limit on how many times a player may impose the Cold Hand
>>>> of Justice per week".
>>>>
>>>> Add a new rule at power 1 entitled "Referee Accountability" with the
>>>> text "If the Referee attempts to issue three or more INEFFECTIVE cards
>>>> in a week, any player CAN, with two support, issue a writ of Impartial
>>>> Arbitration Restoration, immediately making the position of Referee
>>>> vacant. When a writ of Impartial Arbitration Restoration is issued,
>>>> the ADoP SHALL initiate an election for the Referee within a timely
>>>> fashion"
>>>> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> ----
>>> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>>>
>>>

-- 
----
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to