Why not just have one office for tracking all of them since they interact? On 11/17/2017 06:52 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Reuben Staley wrote: >>> * Define three “base” resources, and associated Zmet types. Let’s pretend >>> they’re Ores, Fungi, and Chipmunks. >>> >>> * Define three “refined” resources (G.’s Sports, Coupons, and Widgets), and >>> associated Zmet types. >>> >>> * To produce a Sports using a Zmet, the owner must destroy an Ore and a >>> Fungus that they own. > My first draft of SimAgora had this kind of scheme, but I thought this many > currencies would be a nightmare for recordkeepors. If I (as Arbitor) have > to track several things to know if a CFJ succeeded, it's a bit of a non- > starter. That's why I limited harvests to once/month, and made the > recordkeepor of each key currency the office responsible for the action > (e.g. Promotor for the currency that pends things). > > I really like this sort of combo-system as a principle - but what do > recordkeepors think? > >
-- ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
