I made great use of my campaign proposal. IDK what all these other scrubs
are doing haha.

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 5:56 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-11-20 at 09:48 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > > You can see how it would work better for hard-coded matters of
> > > economic policy:  "if elected, I'll double the supply of land/halve
> > > the cost of pending proposals" or whatever (though if most of the
> > > campaign proposals are like that, there was a lightweight version
> > > called 'budgets' that we used to do).
> >
> > That sounds a lot like a Regulation to me. If we decided to make more
> > use of them (and I'm still pretty iffy on the current implementation),
> > we could perhaps have Campaign Regulations (which get promulgated
> > automatically) rather than needing them to be Proposals.
> >
> > (For what it's worth, my preferred version of a Regulation would be a
> > tracked statement that has no Power, but that can define values that
> > rules are capable of inspecting.)
>
> Regulations could work.  The old system was sort-of like this:
>
>       A Budget is a document maintained by an Officer that contains
>       the values of certain switches defined as being part of that
>       Officer's Budget.  The Budget is part of that Officer's Report.
>
>       The Officer maintaining that Budget CAN flip its switches
>       [subject to whatever per-item constraints] Without Objection.
>       [i.e. things can be adjusted at any time, but only with
>        full consensus]
>
>       A nominee SHOULD submit a Prototype Budget with legal values
>       for all the budget's switches.  These are included in the
>       Election Decision initiation.   When the winner is installed
>       in office, the switches are all flipped to the values in the
>       winner's Prototype. [no separate voting process needed]
>
> In the current system, the Treasuror's Budget would include
> Supply Level, Pend Cost, CFJ Cost, Officer Rewards, etc. instead
> of them being hard-coded in Rules.
>
> In a decentralized system, you split this among Officers, so
> the Treasuror controls the Supply Level, the Arbitor the CFJ cost,
> the Promotor the Pend cost, the ADoP the Officer salary, etc.,
> all as part of their separate Budgets.
>
>
>
>


-- 
>From V.J. Rada

Reply via email to