Actually, I'll gladly accept failure, since you sent your bidding message after me, and I would have wasted favors had this worked. (Also, are historical CFJs a required read for playing Agora now?)
On 11/26/17, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm generally philosophically opposed to arbitrarily complex actions taken > "by announcement". > > CFJ 1774 is, I think, the strongest precedent we have here. The CFJ is > clear that you can't, by default, take an action by announcement > ambiguously; the use of shorthands (and, by extension, conditionals) are a > convenience but not one that can be used abusively. > > On Sun, 26 Nov 2017 at 19:04 Corona <liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I thought about including a simple backup clause, but I ran out of time. >> >> On 11/26/17, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Sun, 26 Nov 2017 at 18:58 Corona <liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> The following 5 paragraphs apply to all actions taken in this message, >> >> other text to the contrary notwithstanding: >> >> >> > >> > I'm willing to argue that most of this message fails due to being too >> > complicated to resolve, but I'm gonna sit this one out and let others >> argue >> > about it. >> > >> >
