This time's economy is indeed the first time we've ever charged for CFJs in history, I'm going with the spirit of the experiment but just as happy to take it out again (preferably bringing in Blots as a replacement).
Meantime, is 2 per week (free) for a non-player about a good compromise? On Mon, 27 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: > On Sun, 26 Nov 2017 at 21:56 Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: > > > Honestly, I’m not sure there’s any reason we should cater to non-players. > > If you want to play the game, be a player. > > > > Gaelan > > > > I'm inclined to agree with this in general, but CFJs are a notable > exception, because otherwise deregistration shuts someone out of being able > to raise questions, including about whether eir deregistration works. > > Generally, I'm of the opinion that there should be no restrictions on > CFJ-calling, except possibly for limits on excess cases. But if you'll > notice, those restrictions are only about lawfulness, rather than > possibility. >
