Honestly, I’m not sure there’s any reason we should cater to non-players. If you want to play the game, be a player.
Gaelan > On Nov 26, 2017, at 6:48 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 27 Nov 2017, Ørjan Johansen wrote: >> On Sun, 26 Nov 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: > >>> b) Without 2 Objections. Players SHOULD object unless paying >>> with shinies is a significant barrier to the Caller's >>> ability to seek a resolution to the controversy. >> >> I might not be calling a lot of CFJs if this passes, then. > > I'd say not-being-a-player is a significant barrier that shouldn't > be objected to by anyone (unless the caller is massively abusing it) - > that was the standard I was aiming for anyway. > >
