We've defined (by precedent) that the standards for clarity for R478
include simple conditionals. R478 is power-3, and lower-powered
definitions are only "guidance". I find it hard to believe that the
simplest conditionals (e.g. "If I did not just succeed with method A,
I do it with method B") wouldn't continue to meet R478 standards of
clarity.
Ergo, this needs to be power-3 and include a "rules to the contrary
notwithstanding", or it doesn't work. Better yet, put it in R478 so
it's all self-contained.
On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> Proposal: Conditional Ban (AI=1, pend=AP)
> {{{
> Enact a new rule entitled 'Unconditionality' reading "Except where the
> rules, implicitly or explicitly, provide a mechanism to do so, actions
> CANNOT be performed conditionally."
> }}}
>
