It's a really badly written paragraph (I wrote it) and unreadable, so my
apologies for that. I couldn't be bothered to make a numbered list that
made sense

On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 8:19 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:

>
>
> Ah, I misread a conjunction in that rule.  apologies.
>
> On Sun, 10 Jun 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > See Rule 2531, which requires, among other things, that the
> > perpetrator did some action prohibited by law. You haven't named a
> > rule that Corona violated.
> >
> > -Aris
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 3:02 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > This one I think?  Did I use it wrong?
> > >
> > > Rule 2479/5 (Power=1.7)
> > > Official Justice
> > >
> > >        The Referee CAN, subject to the provisions of this rule, impose
> > >        Summary Judgment on a person who plays the game by levying a
> fine
> > >        of up to 2 blots on em. Summary Judgement is imposed on the
> > >        Referee's own initiative, and not in response to any official
> > >        proceeding.
> > >
> > >        The Referee CANNOT impose Summary Judgement more than three
> times
> > >        a week.
> > >
> > > On Sun, 10 Jun 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > >> Excuse me, but under which provision of which rule?
> > >>
> > >> -Aris
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 2:13 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu>
> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > I Object to the intent.
> > >> >
> > >> > I Levy a fine of 2 Blots on Corona (Summary Judgement) for this
> > >> > abuse of office.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Sun, 10 Jun 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> > >> >> I object to Corona's intent to win by Apathy.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I nominate myself for Treasuror.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> -twg
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On June 10, 2018 8:12 PM, Corona <liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > [Sun Jun 10 22:12] This line is not a part of the report. Corona
> intends to
> > >> >> win by Apathy without objection.
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
>



-- 
>From V.J. Rada

Reply via email to