I think the Herald must timely award the patent title Champion after a victory per Rule 649:
“... A person permitted and enabled to award (revoke) a Patent Title SHALL do so in a timely fashion after the conditions authorizing em to do so are announced, unless there is an open judicial case contesting the validity of those conditions.” Also per Rule 649, the Herald is responsible for tracking patent titles. So, I *believe* the COE can be resolved either (1) by citing the open CFJ or (2) by noting that the Herald has not yet awarded the Champion title (so the report is correct). I think either of those resolution would not self-ratify the victory out of existence (if it was a victory). And the time limit for the Herald to award the Champion title (if it was a valid win) remains suspended until the CFJ is resolved. D Margaux > On Sep 15, 2018, at 9:35 PM, Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> wrote: > >> On Sat, 15 Sep 2018, D Margaux wrote: >> >> I CoE this Monthly Report on the ground that twg and I won by Apathy > > I don't think this CoE is correct, because Champion is not automatically > awarded and the Herald isn't required to report wins per se. > > Greetings, > Ørjan.
