I will challenge/CoE the counting of any vote done in this matter.
It is wholly unreasonable (beyond the bounds of clarity) to require
persons to look back at past decisions to see what vote was cast.
(public voting should communicate not just with the assessor, but
with everyone).
On Sun, 23 Sep 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> TL;DR: To reiterate your vote on a proposal means to vote and have
> your zombie vote the same way you did last time the voting on the
> proposal was open.
>
> As a general definition, let "I reiterate my vote on X", where X is a
> proposal such that the voting period of an Agoran Decision on the
> subject of whether to adopt X is currently open and that an Agoran
> Decision on the subject of whether to adopt X has previously been
> resolved, be defined as meaning "I unconditionally vote, and act on
> behalf of each zombie that I own to unconditionally vote, the same on
> the Agoran Decision on the subject of whether to adopt X as I did the
> last time I voted on an Agoran Decision on the subject whether to
> adopt X, or PRESENT if I have never before voted on an Agoan Decision
> on the subject of whether to adopt X".
>
> This message is not part of a scam.
>
> [This is an informal general definition that is helpful for proposals
> added again to the pool. The Assessor already has this information,
> which means that it's legal under past precedent to cast a vote that
> requires em to retrieve it.]
>
> -Aris
>
