Hmm. I think the CFJ is trivially false. “Perform” is not defined, so we give it its ordinary meaning. Speaking for myself, I perform (in the sense of “do”) a great many unregulated actions on a daily basis (e.g., waking up, getting dressed, eating meals, reading books, talking to people other than through public fora, etc.).
Begin forwarded message: > From: Cuddle Beam <[email protected]> > Date: October 1, 2018 at 1:13:37 PM EDT > To: [email protected] > Subject: BUS: humble agoran farmer becomes a demiruge of a sort > Reply-To: [email protected] > > I pledge the following: I pledge to be the recordkeepor of absolutely > everything. > > I then CFJ the following: Non-regulated actions cannot be performed. > > Grat. Arguments for that CFJ: > - From R2125: (3) the action would, as part of its effect, modify > information for which some player is required to be a recordkeepor. > - Via that pledge up there, I am required to be the recordkeepor of > absolutely everything (which would include all actions). > - Therefore, all actions are regulated, so performing a non-regulated > action is impossible. > - Note that: "The recordkeepor of a class of assets" is defined, but not > simply a "recordkeepor". Defining what the King of Spain is doesn't define > what Kings are. I assume that "recordkeepor" means simply "someone who > keeps a record of something", anyways. > > This could probably be done "better" with a contract because it's a > stronger "require-ing" than a Pledge, and it could possibly help with that > backing document thing, but yeah. Let's give this a shot.
