Oh wait. I spoke too soon, without understanding the upshot of your pledge. This is a hilarious and awesome pledge/CFJ. Very cool! On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 1:49 PM D Margaux <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hmm. I think the CFJ is trivially false. “Perform” is not defined, so we > give it its ordinary meaning. Speaking for myself, I perform (in the sense > of “do”) a great many unregulated actions on a daily basis (e.g., waking > up, getting dressed, eating meals, reading books, talking to people other > than through public fora, etc.). > > Begin forwarded message: > > > From: Cuddle Beam <[email protected]> > > Date: October 1, 2018 at 1:13:37 PM EDT > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: BUS: humble agoran farmer becomes a demiruge of a sort > > Reply-To: [email protected] > > > > I pledge the following: I pledge to be the recordkeepor of absolutely > > everything. > > > > I then CFJ the following: Non-regulated actions cannot be performed. > > > > Grat. Arguments for that CFJ: > > - From R2125: (3) the action would, as part of its effect, modify > > information for which some player is required to be a recordkeepor. > > - Via that pledge up there, I am required to be the recordkeepor of > > absolutely everything (which would include all actions). > > - Therefore, all actions are regulated, so performing a non-regulated > > action is impossible. > > - Note that: "The recordkeepor of a class of assets" is defined, but not > > simply a "recordkeepor". Defining what the King of Spain is doesn't > define > > what Kings are. I assume that "recordkeepor" means simply "someone who > > keeps a record of something", anyways. > > > > This could probably be done "better" with a contract because it's a > > stronger "require-ing" than a Pledge, and it could possibly help with > that > > backing document thing, but yeah. Let's give this a shot. >
