Especially when pending is free, I think we have a lot of buggy
proposals go into the pool, and the proofreading really doesn't
happen until a quorum-enforced group put on their voting hats
and look closely before voting. I think the formality of that
process is useful.
*However* I don't think it's so much the straight voting-process
delay as the 1+week at each end waiting for promotor/assessor (not
a dig at the current promotor/assessor, this is true regardless of
officeholder). Maybe if there's a way to speed up either end?
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018, D. Margaux wrote:
> I’m considering proposing a rule that would enable proposals to be ADOPTED
> through dependent actions. The idea is that a player could announce intent to
> ADOPT a proposal with X support, where X is the number of players who by
> voting FOR could cause the proposal to be ADOPTED if all active
> non-supporting players vote AGAINST and all zombies vote PRESENT. Seems like
> it could result in potentially quicker adoption of uncontroversial proposals.
>
> I’m curious whether people think this is a good or bad idea
