I confess I am hopelessly confused. The contract doesn’t seem to affect anyone
besides twg and Gaelan. Is it a flaw in the proposal? But then what does that
have to do with the timing of adoption?
> On Nov 5, 2018, at 3:49 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey <m...@timon.red> wrote:
>
> Actually, why am I even bothering with trying to outmanoeuvre Gaelan on my
> own. 3 coins is nothing in the scheme of things.
>
> The text of the document in question is as follows:
>
> {If proposal 8114 is resolved before Nov 7th (UTC), Gaelan SHALL pay twg 3
> coins.}
>
> Proposal 8114, which I MUST resolve ADOPTED before 12th November 2018 01:16
> UTC, is reproduced below. Y'all've got 6 days to figure out what e's planning.
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8114
> Title: Free auctions 2
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: Trigon
> Co-authors: twg, G.
>
>
> [ Comment: Not sure how I actually feel about this being enacted but
> proposals are cheap so I might as well.
>
> Version 2: Clear up wording. ]
>
> Create a new power-1 rule entitled 'Free Auctions' with the text:
>
> A player who is not the Auctioneer of an existing Auction
> specified by this rule CAN, by announcement, initiate an auction
> with emself as the Announcer and Auctioneer.
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>
> -twg
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>> On Monday, November 5, 2018 8:38 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey <m...@timon.red>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I consent to be bound by the terms of the document with this SHA-1 hash sent
>> to me by Gaelan.
>>
>> -twg
>>
>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>>> On Monday, November 5, 2018 7:55 PM, Gaelan Steele g...@canishe.com wrote:
>>>
>>> 073e2cd64e36b95a054420a988ea6c37800d09cc
>>> Gaelan
>
>
