I vote as follows: ID Author(s) AI Title --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8123 Gaelan 3.0 Independence FOR 8124 Trigon 1.0 Only proposals should be distributed AGAINST 8125 Trigon 3.0 Time periods are confusing AGAINST 8126 Trigon 3.0 High-level asset verbs FOR 8127 Trigon 2.0 Reinstituting Rewards FOR 8128 twg 2.0 [1] FOR 8129 twg, Trigon, G. 3.0 Bugfix: Treasuror doesn't self-ratify v2 PRESENT 8130 Gaelan 2.0 Law is Ambiguous Word Act FOR 8131 天火狐, twg 2.0 V.J. Rada Protection Act PRESENT 8132 Aris 1.0 Website Ruleset Update Petition AGAINST
- Jacob Arduino On Sun, Nov 11, 2018, 22:35 Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com wrote: > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal > pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the > quorum is 5, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid > options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are > conditional votes). > > ID Author(s) AI Title > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > 8123 Gaelan 3.0 Independence > 8124 Trigon 1.0 Only proposals should be distributed > 8125 Trigon 3.0 Time periods are confusing > 8126 Trigon 3.0 High-level asset verbs > 8127 Trigon 2.0 Reinstituting Rewards > 8128 twg 2.0 [1] > 8129 twg, Trigon, G. 3.0 Bugfix: Treasuror doesn't self-ratify v2 > 8130 Gaelan 2.0 Law is Ambiguous Word Act > 8131 天火狐, twg 2.0 V.J. Rada Protection Act > 8132 Aris 1.0 Website Ruleset Update Petition > > > [1] With not very much responsibility comes fewer shinies > > The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8123 > Title: Independence > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Gaelan > Co-authors: > > > Prepend “Such an action is known as a dependent action.” to the > beginning of the last paragraph of rule 1728, “Dependent Actions.” > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8124 > Title: Only proposals should be distributed > Adoption index: 1.0 > Author: Trigon > Co-authors: > > > [ COMMENT: This was pretty useless back in the day and it still is. If > someone decides they need this mechanic for anything, just reenact > it. ] > > Repeal Rule 2515 "Distributing Assets". > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8125 > Title: Time periods are confusing > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Trigon > Co-authors: > > > [ COMMENT: The current way is a really roundabout way of doing it, in my > opinion. I'm not sure if this is any better, to be honest, but > I think it has some merit. ] > > Amend Rule 1728 "Dependent Actions" by: > replacing the following: > 2. If the action is to be performed Without N Objections, With N > Agoran Consent, or With Notice, if the intent was announced at > least 4 days earlier > > 3. If the action is to be performed With T Notice, if the intent > was announced at least T earlier. > with: > 2. The intent was announced at least T earlier. If T is undefined, > it is instead considered to be 4 days if the action is not With > N Support; otherwise 0 days. > > and by renumbering the list accordingly. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8126 > Title: High-level asset verbs > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Trigon > Co-authors: > > > [ COMMENT: This terminology is ripped from the coins rule and applies to > all assets. I really like this one. ] > > Amend Rule 2577 "Asset Actions" by replacing the second paragraph with > the following three paragraphs: > For an entity to earn an asset is for that asset to be created in > that entity's possession. To grant an entity an asset is to create > it in eir possession. > > For an entity to lose an asset is for that asset to be destroyed > from that entity's possession. To revoke an asset from an entity > is to destroy it from that entity's possession. > > For entity A to take an asset from entity B is to transfer it from > entity B to entity A. > > > Amend Rule 2559 "Paydays" by replacing its text with: > Whenever a Payday occurs, the following events happen in order: > > 1. Each player first earns 10 coins; then > > 2. For each office, if a single player held that office for 16 or > more days in the previous month and no unforgivable fines were > levied on em for eir conduct in that office during that time, > that player earns 5 coins. > > The occurrence of Paydays is secured. At the beginning of each > month, a Payday occurs. > > > Amend Rule 2499 "Welcome Packages" by replacing its text with: > If a player has not received a Welcome Package since e most > recently registered, any player CAN cause em to receive one by > announcement. > > When a player receives a Welcome Package, e earns 10 coins. > > > Amend Rule 2555 "Blots" by replacing the paragraph beginning "To Lefy a > Fine" with: > To Levy a Fine of N on a person, where N is a positive integer, is > to grant em N blots. To expunge a blot is to destroy it. > > > Amend Rule 2583 "Earning Coins" by deleting the paragraph beginning "For > a player to". > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8127 > Title: Reinstituting Rewards > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Trigon > Co-authors: > > > [ COMMENT: For those of you who know that I really liked the rewards > system from last year, this shouldn't come as a surprise. Now that > there's no minigame, I think we should have a constant source for > earning coins, so how about we tie it to general participation in the > game? ] > > Repeal Rule 2583 "Earning Coins" > > Reenact Rule 2496 "Rewards" and replace its text with: > A player CAN earn the set of assets associated with a reward > condition exactly once in a timely fashion each time e fulfills it > by stating how many assets e earns as a result of this action. > > Below is a list of reward conditions and their associated assets. > > * Being the author of an adopted proposal: a number of coins equal > to ((the total strength of all valid ballots cast FOR the > decision - the total strength of all valid ballots cast AGAINST) > times the adoption index of the result) rounded up. > > * Judging a CFJ that e was assigned to: 5 coins. > > * Publishing a duty-fulfilling report: 5 coins. This reward can > only be claimed once per office per week for a weekly report and > once per office per month for a monthly report. > > * Having a Thesis pass peer-review and be granted a Degree based > on its merit: 20 shinies > > > If a proposal by Trigon has not passed in the same distribution as this > proposal entitled "High-level asset verbs", amend rule 2496 by replacing > all instances of the word "earn" with "create in eir possession". > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8128 > Title: With not very much responsibility comes fewer shinies > Adoption index: 2.0 > Author: Trigon > Co-authors: > > > Amend rule 2559, "Paydays", by changing the text "For each office" to > "For each office that has official duties". > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8129 > Title: Bugfix: Treasuror doesn't self-ratify v2 > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: twg > Co-authors: Trigon, G. > > Amend Rule 2166, "Assets", by appending the following paragraph to it: > > For a class of assets to be "tracked by" an entity is for that > entity to be its recordkeepor. > > For the purposes of this proposal, the "Authoritative Document" is the > document that as of the resolution of the most recent Agoran Decision > to adopt this proposal: > (a) is a portion of the Treasuror's weekly report; > (b) is a list of all instances of coins and their owners; > (c) has been continuously undoubted for at least one week; and > (d) is the most recently published document that satisfies each of > criteria (a), (b) and (c). > > Ratify the Authoritative Document. Designate this ratification a > convergence. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8130 > Title: Law is Ambiguous Word Act > Adoption index: 2.0 > Author: Trigon > Co-authors: > > > Amend Rule 2531 (Referee Accountability) by replacing “law” with “the > rules." > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8131 > Title: V.J. Rada Protection Act > Adoption index: 2.0 > Author: 天火狐 > Co-authors: twg > > > Amend Rule 1885, "Zombie Auctions", by appending the following as a > new paragraph: > > Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, if a player's master > switch is flipped while a zombie auction in which e is a lot > is ongoing, then the winner of that lot NEED NOT pay Agora eir > bid and Agora CANNOT and NEED NOT transfer the contents of the > lot to the winner. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8132 > Title: Website Ruleset Update Petition > Adoption index: 1.0 > Author: Aris > Co-authors: > > > WHEREAS the FLR is the most complete record of Agora's rules; > WHEREAS the copy of the Ruleset posted on the Agoran website is thus a form > of the FLR; > WHEREAS Players, Observers, and Other Interested Parties go to Agora's > website > for the most accurate and current information about the rules; > WHEREAS the FLR is only updated once a month; and > WHEREAS, given that the Rulesets are generated programmatically, > it would impose little additional strain on the Rulekeepor to update > the version of the FLR posted on the website each time e releases an > SLR (i.e. once a week); > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that it is THE WILL OF AGORA that the > Honorable > Rulekeepor update the main ruleset linked from the Agoran website each time > e releases an SLR, and that e additionally post a copy of the official FLR > on the website. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >
