> On Jan 29, 2019, at 12:28 PM, Reuben Staley <reuben.sta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Interesting that I judged 3592 more recently than 83 or 84 but it's not
> recorded anywhere.

Oops. The decision in 3692 was recorded in the Court Gazette of 20 January, but 
I forgot to add it to the list of recently judged CFJs. Will do that next time. 

BTW, G. had intended to seek reconsideration of that CFJ, which I thought was a 
good idea, because IRRELEVANT probably isn’t the right decision. If the 
arguments were lacking enough detail, I think DISMISS is more proper. 

It may be too late to do that though. 

Reply via email to