FTR, my preferred remedy for this situation would be to undo the win and any consequences of it and then pass a rule saying that a person CANNOT win if doing e does it by violating a rule. For good measure, I’d add to the ruleset somewhere that deliberate rulebreaking for personal gain is STRONGLY DISCOURAGED.
-Aris On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 3:39 PM Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I disagree with this in principle. This isn’t a loophole, it’s a matter of > trust. We should be able to trust our officers not to deliberately flout > the rules. We have social conventions for a reason. > > -Aris > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 3:37 PM D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I submit this proposal: > > > > Title: Favour Loophole Closure > > Author: D Margaux > > AI: 1 > > > > Amend Rule 2542 to replace: > > > > “The following officers CAN by announcement award Favours in the listed > > Parties, but SHALL NOT do so except as required by rule.” > > > > With: > > > > “The following officers CAN by announcement award Favours in the listed > > Parties only to the extent required by rule.” >
