By "undo the win" do you mean a consent process on some level? Or a
platonic nullification of the win (trying to draft the latter is what caused
all the issues).
On 1/30/2019 3:47 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
FTR, my preferred remedy for this situation would be to undo the win and
any consequences of it and then pass a rule saying that a person CANNOT win
if doing e does it by violating a rule. For good measure, I’d add to the
ruleset somewhere that deliberate rulebreaking for personal gain is
STRONGLY DISCOURAGED.
-Aris
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 3:39 PM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
I disagree with this in principle. This isn’t a loophole, it’s a matter of
trust. We should be able to trust our officers not to deliberately flout
the rules. We have social conventions for a reason.
-Aris
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 3:37 PM D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com> wrote:
I submit this proposal:
Title: Favour Loophole Closure
Author: D Margaux
AI: 1
Amend Rule 2542 to replace:
“The following officers CAN by announcement award Favours in the listed
Parties, but SHALL NOT do so except as required by rule.”
With:
“The following officers CAN by announcement award Favours in the listed
Parties only to the extent required by rule.”
