Or it could just be the Priest, really Also, I suggest to be able to waive a Collect by submitting a sufficiently impressive work of venerative literature or art (it would also be a way to add more made-up creed and fun roleplay to this)
On Sun, 17 Feb 2019 at 00:54, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Maybe an Inquisitor to coordinate the consensus-shunning process and > otherwise suggest appropriately religious punishments. > > On Sun, 17 Feb 2019 at 00:17, D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> > On Feb 16, 2019, at 5:25 PM, D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> >> On Feb 16, 2019, at 2:58 PM, Aris Merchant < >> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> I don’t much like the idea of enforcing minor violations against >> someone >> >> who hasn’t agreed to it. It doesn’t quite seem fair. >> > >> > Well, the heretic can point eir finger at all of the faithful for >> abetting heresy... >> >> But more seriously, if the people interested in joining preferred, we >> could use other language. But I’m still amused by the idea of having some >> sort of retaliation against a “heretic,” unless people are definitely >> opposed. >> >> Maybe: >> >> “The heretic MUST be shunned. The faithful SHOULD determine by consensus >> among themselves what an appropriate shunning would entail for any given >> heretic.” > >
