Sorry. I did see your original comment but completely forgot to get around to writing a revised proposal.
-twg -------- Original Message -------- On 4 Mar 2019, 02:18, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > This is broken. As I pointed out in a previous comment on this proposal, > rule (tel:2591) no longer contains this text. > > Greetings, > Ørjan. > > On Sun, 3 Mar (tel:2019), Aris Merchant wrote: > >> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >> ID: (tel:8169) >> Title: Spaceship Armour Defaults >> Adoption index: 1.0 >> Author: twg >> Co-authors: D Margaux, Telnaior >> >> >> Amend Rule (tel:2591), "Spaceships", by replacing the following: >> >> * Armour (an integer switch limited to values from 0 to 10 >> inclusive). >> >> with: >> >> * Armour (an integer switch limited to values from 0 to 10 >> inclusive, defaulting to 10). >> >> Flip to 10 the Armour of each Spaceship that, at the time of the >> submission of this proposal, was: >> >> * in Sector 04 and owned by Baron von Vaderham, or; >> * in Sector 05 and owned by twg [previously Lost & Found], or; >> * in Sector 08 and owned by Falsifian, or; >> * in Sector 09 and owned by Telnaior, or; >> * in Sector 16 and owned by Telnaior [previously Lost & Found].