Cuddle Beam originally posted these two essays as a thesis on 13 Feb 2019. G., The Herald at the time, posted a message requesting comment. I could find no replies. I would like to again invite comments in a timely fasion after which I will attempt to award an associate of nomic if no comments have been received.
On Thursday, June 6, 2019, 4:24:34 PM CDT, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: necrobump review ples waifus and husbandos https://i.imgur.com/TkLQDap.png On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 8:08 AM Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: > I could submit the essays here first if that is preferred but it would > really just feel like I’m changing the order of what I’d like to do anyways > > - Submit to Agora->Post elsewhere > - Post elsewhere->submit to Agora. > > They both (to me) feel very much the same. I can understand how it could > appear more academically ambitious/worthy to (appear to) do essays > specifically for Agora, but that’s not really the full intent I’d really do > them for, I just do essays because I like to do them. And if I can cash in > some cool stuff on the side because of it, all the better lol. > > On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 00:02, Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote: > >> >> The standards can be degree-specific, too. If we follow the U.S. model, >> "an >> essay that I've written before with a few extra comments after review" is >> probably about right for an Associates degree but not anything higher. >> >> On 2/13/2019 2:03 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: >> > We have had some theses IIRC where someone wrote an extensive reply to >> someone and decided to tack on a “I submit this for a degree” (in the same >> message). But that’s not exactly the same thing >> > >> > Gaelan >> > >> >> On Feb 13, 2019, at 12:23 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote: >> >> >> >> To satisfy the "The Herald SHOULD coordinate the peer-review process >> >> and the rewarding of the degree", I invite commentary including >> >> suggestions on appropriate Degrees for this, if any, to be provided in >> >> a timely fashion. I'll do my best to give comments myself. Then if >> >> there is any commentary, I'd invite CuddleBeam's response. Once >> >> that opportunity has been given, I'll start a 2 Agoran Consent process >> >> (or two processes). Of course, players are free to start a Consent >> >> process themselves but I'll personally keep to the SHOULD. >> >> >> >> To start, a process question for people in general: Does this meet >> >> the "original" criterion in R1367, as it was clearly written for >> >> another purpose? (I'm not sure I have an opinion on that yet so I'm >> >> interested in what people think. I wouldn't want to get bogged down >> >> in this meta-discussion too much and this should be mostly about >> >> content, but it's worth asking as this hasn't come up before AFAICT). >> >> >> >> =The Herald >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 12:09 PM Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> I submit the following essays for peer review and degree awarding: >> >>> >> >>> Beginner's strategy guide for Blognomic: >> >>> >> https://wiki.blognomic.com/index.php?title=Beginner%27s_Strategy_Guide >> >>> >> >>> AOV Nomic's history: >> https://wiki.blognomic.com/index.php?title=AOVNomic >> >>> >> >>> (The titles are "X of Nomic", not "X of Agora Nomic" or the sort, and >> >>> essays about Agora, a certain nomic, have been submitted in the past, >> so >> >>> these are essays about other certain nomics too, for general nomic >> >>> interest.) >> > >> >
