On Tue, 2019-06-11 at 12:13 -0400, Jason Cobb wrote: > I was suggesting a problem with G.'s suggested wording: "except as > described by a proposal or rule". I think with the current wording, > you're right, although it does prevent players from destroying eir > own blots, which is what the CFJ is about.
Why not just "except as described by an instrument"? That automatically excludes unadopted proposals. -- ais523
