Ah sorry about that then.
Jason Cobb
On 6/21/19 10:53 PM, Rebecca wrote:
We've always taken it to mean the player who actually takes the action that
requires support. For example, I have intended to initiate elections but I
also don't want three of those positions, so I will leave anyone who does
to actually resolve the intent.
On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 12:46 PM Jason Cobb <[email protected]> wrote:
Would you actually be installed into the office? Rule 2598 says
5. A player CAN with 2 support Revive Spaaace (unless Spaaace has
already been Revived); that player is thereby installed into
the office of Astronomor.
I think the most obvious reading is that "that player" would still be R.
Lee, since e is the one that announced intent. Do you happen to know if
there is precedent for this?
Jason Cobb
On 6/21/19 10:43 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
Yes, but then I’d be installed into the relevant office. I don’t want
another office at the moment, and anyway, it would be rude to take it
from
R. Lee.
-Aris
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 7:36 PM Jason Cobb <[email protected]>
wrote:
You can do so due to this clause from Rule 2595:
4. At least one of the following is true:
* the performer is the initiator;
* the initiator was authorized to perform the action due
to
holding a rule-defined position now held by the
performer;
or
* the initiator is authorized to perform the action, the
action depends on support, the performer has supported
the
intent, and the rule authorizing the performance does
not
explicitly prohibit supporters from performing it;
Rule 2598 ("Side-Game Suspension") contains no such clause to prohibit
supporters from doing so.
Jason Cobb
On 6/21/19 10:32 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 11:18 PM James Cook <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 at 03:35, Rebecca <[email protected]>
wrote:
I support but I intend with 2 support to revive spaaaace.
I support R. Lee's intent to revive spaaace.
I also support. R. Lee, remember to do so.
-Aris
