Don't be sorry for interpreting the rules! I say this only because it's just what I've always remembered. Also I've taken the office so it doesn't matter now!
On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 12:55 PM Jason Cobb <[email protected]> wrote: > Ah sorry about that then. > > Jason Cobb > > On 6/21/19 10:53 PM, Rebecca wrote: > > We've always taken it to mean the player who actually takes the action > that > > requires support. For example, I have intended to initiate elections but > I > > also don't want three of those positions, so I will leave anyone who does > > to actually resolve the intent. > > > > On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 12:46 PM Jason Cobb <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Would you actually be installed into the office? Rule 2598 says > >> > >>> 5. A player CAN with 2 support Revive Spaaace (unless Spaaace > has > >>> already been Revived); that player is thereby installed into > >>> the office of Astronomor. > >> I think the most obvious reading is that "that player" would still be R. > >> Lee, since e is the one that announced intent. Do you happen to know if > >> there is precedent for this? > >> > >> > >> Jason Cobb > >> > >> On 6/21/19 10:43 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > >>> Yes, but then I’d be installed into the relevant office. I don’t want > >>> another office at the moment, and anyway, it would be rude to take it > >> from > >>> R. Lee. > >>> > >>> -Aris > >>> > >>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 7:36 PM Jason Cobb <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>> You can do so due to this clause from Rule 2595: > >>>> > >>>>> 4. At least one of the following is true: > >>>>> > >>>>> * the performer is the initiator; > >>>>> > >>>>> * the initiator was authorized to perform the action > due > >> to > >>>>> holding a rule-defined position now held by the > >> performer; > >>>>> or > >>>>> > >>>>> * the initiator is authorized to perform the action, > the > >>>>> action depends on support, the performer has > supported > >> the > >>>>> intent, and the rule authorizing the performance does > >> not > >>>>> explicitly prohibit supporters from performing it; > >>>> Rule 2598 ("Side-Game Suspension") contains no such clause to prohibit > >>>> supporters from doing so. > >>>> > >>>> Jason Cobb > >>>> > >>>> On 6/21/19 10:32 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > >>>>> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 11:18 PM James Cook <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>> On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 at 03:35, Rebecca <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>>>>> I support but I intend with 2 support to revive spaaaace. > >>>>>> I support R. Lee's intent to revive spaaace. > >>>>> I also support. R. Lee, remember to do so. > >>>>> > >>>>> -Aris > >>>>> > > > -- >From R. Lee
