No

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 2:42 PM Jason Cobb <[email protected]> wrote:

> So would I face prejudice if I were to open the exact same CFJs again
> later once we actually get CHoJ fixed?
>
> Jason Cobb
>
> On 7/3/19 12:38 AM, omd wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 7:49 PM Jason Cobb <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> Dang it; you are absolutely right, and I didn't consider that.
> >>
> >> Note to judge omd: this applies just as well to CFJ 3743.
> >> Jason Cobb
> >>
> >> On 7/2/19 10:45 PM, James Cook wrote:
> >>> Gratuitous argument:
> >>>
> >>> As far as I know, finger-pointing still isn't fixed. CFJ 3736
> >>> determined that the Referee CANNOT levy a fine.
> >>>
> >>> Proposal 8181 is supposed to fix it, but D. Margaux's attempt to
> >>> resolve it on June 22 failed because it didn't list Telnaior's votes,
> >>> as G. noted in a CoE a few hours later.
> > Does Proposal 8181 actually fix it?  Rule 2557 still needs a "by
> announcement".
> >
> > In any case, it seems to be true that Proposal 8181 hasn't even been
> adopted.
> >
> > I judge both CFJ 3743 and CFJ 3753 FALSE, with the above-quoted
> > messages as evidence.
>


-- 
>From R. Lee

Reply via email to