The rule says "remove (syn. retract, withdraw)". On Sat, 6 Jul 2019 at 15:54, Jason Cobb <jason.e.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This may be a bit nit-picky, but I don't believe "withdraw" is defined > for rules, only "repeal". > > Jason Cobb > > On 7/6/19 10:52 AM, James Cook wrote: > > On Sat, 6 Jul 2019 at 14:38, James Cook <jc...@cs.berkeley.edu> wrote: > >> I submit a proposal as follows. > >> > >> Title: Police Power > > Actually, to get R. Lee potentially on board, I'll make the proposal > > shorten the ruleset. > > > > I withdraw the proposal I most recently submitted (title "Police Power"). > > > > I submit a proposal as follows. > > > > Title: Administrative Reform and Police Power Omnibus > > Co-authors: Jason Cobb > > Adoption index: 1.7 > > Text: > > > > Withdraw Rule 2597 (Line-item Veto). > > > > In Rule 2557, replace the first paragraph with: > > > > When the rules authorize an investigator to impose the Cold Hand > > of Justice for a violation, e CAN do so by levying a fine of B on > > the perp by announcement, within the following guidelines: > > > > and add a new list item at the start of the list (that is, right after > > the first paragraph), with the text: > > > > - B is at least 1 and at most twice the base value of the > > violation. > > > > Retitle Rule 2557 to "Sentencing Guidelines". > > > > [Comment: Rule 2557 is currently titled "Removing Blots". When I tried > > to understand why, I noticed that the 2018-04-07 SLR lists two Rule > > 2557s, one of which actually is about removing blots, and the other of > > which is titled "Sentencing Guidelines". The next SLR I could find is > > published much later, 2018-10-14, and has R2557 in or close to its > > current form. I don't know exactly what happened there.]
-- - Falsifian
