I'd be happy to weigh in but I note that I have made my opinion pretty clear, so.
I haven't gotten a cfj in a while. maybe it's because my judgements are never clear xD On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 9:56 PM D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com> wrote: > I rescue from these two CFJs. Although I believe my reasoning was correct, > I do not feel strongly about it and the cfjs have engendered enough > controversy that I think it worthwhile for another judge to weigh in. > > > On Jul 7, 2019, at 9:33 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote: > > > > 3745 Motion for D. Margaux to reconsider [Due Sat 13 Jul 2019 08:23:08] > > https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3745 > > There exists an Agoran Decision to adopt a proposal with the title > > 'It's caused enough trouble already' and with a valid adoption > > index. > > > > 3744 Motion for D. Margaux to reconsider [Due Sat 13 Jul 2019 08:23:08] > > https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3744 > > There exists a proposal with the title 'It's caused enough trouble > > already' and with a valid adoption index. > -- >From R. Lee
