On Wed, 2019-07-17 at 22:58 -0400, Aris Merchant wrote: > It doesn’t matter; the rules define instances of a currency owned by > the same person as completely fungible.
The two readings lead to different outcomes: "I pay a fee of 1 coin, the reason to do this was so that the coin I paid would be destroyed"; "I pay a fee of 1 coin, when I do that it causes a coin to be destroyed, meaning that I'm now down two coins". I suspect only one of these readings is a possible action under the Rules, but they both seem to fit the standard English meaning of the words. -- ais523
