On Sun, 4 Aug 2019 at 14:53, Jason Cobb <jason.e.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/4/19 2:57 AM, James Cook wrote:
> > I submit myself to the Agoran Gods! I submit the following rule to the
> > contest:
> >
> > {
> >
> > I dedicate this rule to ARCAS.
> >
> > Every new rule must be dedicated to exactly one Agoran God, called the
> > rule's Patron God. The Patron God must have been mentioned in a previous
> > contest message.
> >
> > The validity requirements added by rules after this apply only to rules
> > dedicated to a different Patron God. (For example, if a rule dedicated
> > to the LORD said that new rules must rhyme, that requirement would only
> > apply to rules not dedicated to the LORD.)
> >
> > }
> >
> > I praise the LORD. I thank ARCAS, god of the very land we live on. I
> > honour THE AGORAN SPIRIT OF THE GAME.
> >
> >
> Clever, but does this work? If each future rule does not incorporate
> this provision, then a rule that violates a future rule (even if the
> same Patron God) would still be "inconsistent" with the rule that it is
> violating, which would make it invalid.
>
> --
> Jason CobbGood point, maybe it doesn't work. -- - Falsifian
