On 9/2/19 12:00 AM, James Cook wrote:
I'm reminded of H. Judge D. Margaux's conclusion in the judgement of
CFJ 3737* that an action can be regulated for some people and not
others. I wonder if existing could be regulated for some entities but
not others. Though I'm a bit confused about where that would lead,
e.g. if a Coin doesn't exist because the rules say it doesn't, then
does that mean its existence is no longer regulated since it's not
actually a Coin?
*https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3737
Statement: "If the contract in evidence were to come into force,
breathing would be a regulated action."
James
I remember that judgement (that was a fun case), but I'm still not quite
sure how H. Judge D. Margaux reached the conclusion that R2125 can apply
the same action differently to different entities.
--
Jason Cobb
