On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 12:24, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Another thought experiment: > 1. intent > 2. intent again > 3. action that's very direct and explicit in citing intent #1 (e.g. > "having > posted intent in the quoted message (#1), I do X.") > 4. It turns out something minor and technical was wrong with the first > intent > that wasn't wrong with the second intent. > > Does it work? > I believe it does, but it's orthogonal to the proposal, correct? Alexis