On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 12:24, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:

> Another thought experiment:
> 1.  intent
> 2.  intent again
> 3.  action that's very direct and explicit in citing intent #1 (e.g.
> "having
> posted intent in the quoted message (#1), I do X.")
> 4.  It turns out something minor and technical was wrong with the first
> intent
> that wasn't wrong with the second intent.
>
> Does it work?
>

I believe it does, but it's orthogonal to the proposal, correct?

Alexis

Reply via email to