On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 1:48 PM Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote:
> The officer was under a
> SHALL to check all transactions, but any that got missed (after a
> certain time limit) succeeded "for free".
The Rule for this was reasonably self-contained and seems similar to
what you're talking about, so figured I'd post it:
Rule 1941/2 (Power=1)
Fees
If the Rules associate a non-negative cost, price, charge, or
fee with an action, that action is a fee-based action. If the
specified cost is not an integer, the actual fee is the next
highest integer.
To perform a fee-based action, a Player (the Actor) who is
otherwise permitted to perform the action must announce that e
is performing the action and announce that there is a fee for
that action. Upon said announcement, the action is performed,
the Actor's kudos are decreased by the fee, and Agora's kudos
are increased by the fee.
Any Player (hereafter the challenger) may announce that the
Actor possessed insufficient Honor (kudos) to perform the
action, provided e issues eir challenge within 7 days of the
attempted action.
As soon as possible after such a challenge, the Herald shall
confirm or deny whether the Actor possessed kudos equal to or
greater than the fee at the time e attempted the action. If the
Actor in fact possessed insufficient honor, or the honor of the
Actor cannot be determined by reasonable effort, the action
shall be deemed to have not occurred and the kudos of the Actor
(and Agora) shall be deemed to have not been changed by the fee.
If a Player issues a challenge as above, but more than 7 days
have passed since the attempted action, then the action shall be
permitted to stand. As soon as possible after a late challenge
is issued, the Herald shall confirm or deny its correctness.
But in this case the Fee shall be recorded even if the Actor is
left with negative kudos.
