On Sat, 2020-02-01 at 16:17 +0000, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote: > This is a counter-proto to Alexis's "Ratification by Legal Fiction", > in the sense that I think it also fixes the problem of ratification > failing due to minimal gamestate changes being ambiguous. It is a > more radical change and makes the use of ratification less concise, > but in my opinion the reward is that it greatly increases simplicity > and certainty in what the effect of ratification actually is.
A problem that the current rules have, and that I don't think this fixes: what happens if a ratification simulates a change to the past gamestate that would prevent the ratification itself from having occured, or from causing it to do something different? I'm not sure what the correct answer to this is, but I think it's a question worth thinking about. -- ais523
