On Sat, Feb 1, 2020, 19:41 omd via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> A rule may state or imply that 'X is treated as if it > were Y', but this is considered an attempt to redefine X, > subject to the usual standards for definitions. > What's the purpose of this? Does that mean if there were a rule saying "George Washington is treated as if e were still alive", this would be considered an attempt to redefine George Washington? —Warrigal >
