On Fri, Feb 14, 2020, 14:12 Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business < [email protected]> wrote:
> > 8331j Warrigal 1.7 Promissory cleanliness > Conditional: AGAINST if Warrigal votes AGAINST; otherwise PRESENT. I > don't object in principle, but, I mean, you didn't _have_ to set your > pledge's expiry date a full year in the future... > I'm more than happy to be bound by the pledge for an entire year. :D However, it might be convenient for the other players for the pledge to go away sooner than that. —Warrigal >
