On 5/12/20 10:12 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> I'm happy to have others do it too, but there should be some
> coordination so we don't end up with two people working on summaries
> for the same week. (Maybe the Reportor contract could issue a unique
> asset for each week that determines who's responsible for, and
> entitled to the reward for, that week.)
>
> - Falsifian
Hmm... this brings up an interesting question. If we have publicly
funded contract, we probably don't want a few people being able to
change the contract by unanimous agreement.
I can see a few ways to solve this, but I'm sure there are more:
* We could restrict amendments for a contract with non-default charity
level.
* We could only give public funding to contracts with sufficiently
many parties to prevent malicious amendment.
--
Jason Cobb
