On Sunday, 31 May 2020, 20:29:09 GMT+1, grok via agora-business <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, May 31, 2020, 2:08 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-official > <[email protected]> wrote: > > =============================== CFJ 3837 =============================== > > > > Falsifian owns at least one blot if and only if English Wikipedia > > has an article titled "Sponge". > > > > ========================================================================== > > I am developing my opinion but think I'm missing some pieces, so I am > soliciting gratuitous arguments here. > > I pledge to give 1 shiny to the first three players who submit gratuitous > arguments on CFJ 3837 before my judgment is submitted.
Arguments: although Blot ownership is not IRRELEVANT, the actual statement of the CFJ is IRRELEVANT; there's no particular relevance in the combination of Falsifian's blot holdings and the existence of a particular Wikipedia article. If CFJs like this one were deemed to be relevant, then judges could be forced to evaluate the truth of almost arbitrary statements that had nothing to do with Agora. I'd personally find this useful, but it seems rather unfair on the judges. -- ais523
