On 6/20/20 12:23 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote: > On 6/19/20 11:20 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote: >> You wrote a proposal designed specifically to only be used for narrow >> patches and then immediately claimed authority to use it because, in >> your arguments, literally any rule text impacts the rulekeepor and >> therefore the rulekeepor can certify any patch. That feels like an abuse >> of that sort of power to me. (This is not indicative of my ruling on the >> cfj, I will review it more thoroughly.) > Shoot I'm sorry, Jason did that not you. I'm tired. >
I'm sorry, and I don't really plan to make a habit of doing it. I did it mostly because I thought it was actually an important fix and I wanted to see if my arguments on the interpretation of the rule would be accepted. -- Jason Cobb
